Catholic in Film School

17 Jun

Review: The movie where grass will shank you.

Sigh.

Despite the fact that the entire theatre was shrieking from laughter, The Happening is a sci-fi-ish thriller where one day people just start flipping out and killing themselves. One chick uses her hair chopsticks to stab herself in the neck, another guy drives into a tree, another one shoots himself…you get the picture. At first everyone thinks it’s biological terrorism, but eventually our protagonist Elliot Moore (Mark Wahlberg) a biology teacher by trade, figures out that the real problem is….the plants. (AAAAAAAAAH!) As it turns out (I know I’m spoiling it…sorry) the real problem is that mother Earth is defending herself against big bad humankind by releasing some sort of hormone/chemical/thingamajig that causes people to kill themselves. (Geeez M. Night, global warming much?) Elliot grabs his wife Alma (Zooey Deschanel), his best friend Julian (John Leguizamo) and Julian’s daughter Jess (Ashlyn Sanchez) to escape the city and find safety somewhere the chemicals haven’t been released into the air. People die, trees triumph…the movie just gets more freaky deaky from there…

I never saw Lady in the Water, but I didn’t believe the hype that M. Night Shyamalan had lost his mojo either. Some of my favorite thrillers are Shyamalan pictures….and I just…I wouldn’t allow myself to believe the hype. Well let me tell you, M. Night Shyamalan has lost his mojo. (Maybe he’s madly in love…or sick? Does anyone know?) Because sweet baby Jesus The Happening was awful. Within the first 20 minutes I turned to my mother and said, “This is the worst movie ever” which of course she promptly shushed and said, “It’ll get better.” (Let’s just say that once the credits rolled some guy a few seats down from me yelled, “That was bulls***!” a statement that the entire theatre promptly applauded.)

Usually I can deal with an otherwise bad movie if the screenwriting is decent and the cinematography is interesting. But the screenwriting was awful and the cinematography was even worse. Much of the dialogue was boring and repetitive (Zooey Deschanel must have asked “Do you think it’s the plants?” at least ten times) and the cinematography was all wrong. Zooey Deschanel is a very beautiful woman, but she has these big round blue eyes that if not framed correctly can make her look wacky. So if you use repeated close-ups of her with these huge blue eyes the scene becomes comical, not scary.

And then there was Mark Wahlberg. It was bad enough that his lines were crazy too (like “Why are you only giving me one piece of useless information at a time?” Whaaaat?) but he also delivered half of them in that fake high-pitched voice people use to talk to a baby. I’ve never met him, but Mark Wahlberg looks like the kind of guy who could put a few mofos’ faces on the ground if he really wanted to…I’m just sayin…

My favorite scene was a tie between one where a guy feeds himself to a group of zoo lions and another particularly hilarious chilling scene where Mark Wahlberg tries to negotiate with a tree not to kill him, his wife, and his best friend’s daughter who is under his care. All I could think was, “Mark, if the tree is really that threatening just drop kick it 300 Spartan style or burn it or something and let’s roll the credits.”

I honestly don’t understand how M. Night could have messed this up so badly. Any form of airborne disease or sickness is utterly terrifying and therefore an awesome device for a film. If I had any control over the marketing of the film I would have demanded the genre be changed to a thriller-comedy just so we could save a little face. Geez louize….

If you were thinking about going to see this movie…don’t…or do…if you’re looking for a good laugh. (But don’t say I didn’t warn you.)

Pax Christi, Rebecca.

PS: Here’s one positive thing—the film has a great title. There, be happy now.

6 Responses to “Review: The movie where grass will shank you.”

  1. 1
    Josh from Ohio Says:

    I loved your review! I laughed a lot just reading it to my wife Shanon. I love Mark Wahlberg, but a biology teacher? Come on. It sounds like just another movie that furthers the Global Warming agenda. I was listening to Glenn Beck one day and a caller called in saying that she and her husband rented a movie that came out directly to DVD about a group of evil Americans who go up to Alaska to drill for oil and are hunted down and killed by the spirits of all the animals that were supposedly killed by the drilling. She said the only reason she rented it was because on the box it said “The scariest movie of the year!” I would have taken it back to Blockbuster and demand a full refund! Okay, I probably wouldn’t because it would be my own dang fault for believing the box (when there is only one copy of it on the shelf). My wife is always lecturing me not to rent the movies where there is only one copy on the shelf. And usually she is right, but I am hopeful that I’ll find a gem amongst the single-copy movies. Oh well.

    I’m glad you did a review of this movie, because I was considering going to see it this weekend with a friend of mine, who I haven’t seen in a while. Shanon and I went and saw “The Strangers” opening night and thought it was pretty scurry, but I laughed quite a bit on that one too. I was laughing more at the slow gasps as people finally saw the creepy masked people appearing from the shadows. It was a fun movie to see in a packed theater. Okay, well this is getting long so bye.

  2. 2
    catholicinfilmschool Says:

    My review wasn’t even that great. The First Things review was HILARIOUS:

    All I know is that, after about half an hour, I, too, tried to kill myself. First I flung myself from the top row of the stadium seating at our local Regal Cinemas. I did not fling with sufficient thrust, however, and landed in the lap of one Mrs. Marilyn Belfry of Rego Park, who I now owe $12 to cover a dry-cleaning bill. I then tried consuming the box my Sno-Caps came in. After about five minutes I began to experience a profound sense of physical and psychological well-being, proving once again that junk-food wrappers are often more nutritious than the yummies themselves.

  3. 3
    SKLS Says:

    Ditto to it all. Ick. And if I’m not mistaken Roger Ebert gave it 3 stars? I would say two at the MOST! It does NOT deserve the praise.

  4. 4
    Clayton Says:

    Well, Rebecca, the movie might have sucked, but do you know how many plants it has saved? :)

    In all seriosity, I thought this movie definitely wasn’t Happening.

    http://www.doxaweb.com/blog/2008/06/can-this-be-happening.ht m

  5. 5
    CFS Says:

    [...] flying demon things in it but believe me when I say it was lame. Why Mark Whalberg, why? First that stupid tree movie than [...]

  6. 6
    Modestia Says:

    [...] flying demon things in it but believe me when I say it was lame. Why Mark Whalberg, why? First that stupid tree movie now [...]

Leave a Reply

© 2009 Catholic in Film School | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)

Design by Catholic Library - Powered By StBlogs Catholic Blogs and Catholic News